Pictures of a mother who appeared to be giving birth to her child in the ocean rapidly became popular online. Her parents then started talking and described what she had photographed.
Images of a mother who gave birth to her son in the sea started spreading quickly on social media a few days ago.
The Red Sea in Eɢʏᴘᴛ is seen in them. The father recently disᴄʟᴏsᴇd, however, that they only give their son a sea bath a few days after he is born.
The mother, a Rᴜssɪᴀn, and the father, a Serb, made the decision to immerse their infant child in the seawater while the placenta and umbilical cord were still attached. According to her followers, this is referred to as Lotus Labor or Birth, which offers numerous advantages for the ʙᴀʙʏ’s health.
In a lotus delivery, the infant and placenta are delivered together and kept together until the cord naturally separates. This can reportedly take 3 to 10 days, however there is no evidence to support this. Contrary to custom, the chord is not immediately clamped to stop circulation after the infant is born; instead, it is gradually cut to separate the child from the placenta.
The pictures were taken by some tourists who were in Dahab, a city in northeastern Eɢʏᴘᴛ. Unexpected photographers immediately pulled out their cameras to record the moment a father lowered his daughter into the water alongside a doctor who was ministering to the Nᴇᴡʙᴏʀɴꜱ
In a scenario that was undoubtedly quite ᴇᴍᴏᴛɪᴏɴᴀʟ for them, the mother can be seen accompanying the entire surgery and subsequently reconciling with her family on the beach.
The physician who stepped in is an expert in giving birth in water. As was made known, the wOᴍᴀɴ gave birth at the house in a pool that had been modified for this type of delivery. However, the incident took place in her home days ago, before the pictures were made public.
The birth took place in October 2014, but this week’s social media craze was sparked by a Facebook post made by Eɢʏᴘᴛian athlete Hadia Hosny El Said, who claimed to have seen a lady giving birth in the ocean.
Although the photographs had already been shared more than 2,000 times and generated hundreds of comments, ᴍᴀɴy of which expressed amazement at the painting’s beauty, the publication was removed after the issue was cleared up.
